In re Trevino
This text of 222 So. 3d 38 (In re Trevino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
11 Considering the Motion for Revocation of Conditional Admission filed jointly by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s conditional admission to the practice of law in the State of Louisiana be revoked, effective immediately. Respondent may not reapply for admission until he can demonstrate at least a one-year period of sobrb ety and compliance with the terms and conditions of a contract with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Should respondent thereafter choose to submit an application for readmission, he shall comply with all requirements of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs associated with these proceedings.
FOR THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 So. 3d 38, 2017 WL 2823057, 2017 La. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trevino-la-2017.