In re Treuber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Treuber

94 A.D.2d 325, 464 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17991

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1983·Published

Opinion

OPINION of the court

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 21, 1967, under the name of William F. Treuber.

On December 9, 1982, in the Supreme Court, New York County, respondent was found guilty, after trial, of conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law, § 105.05), a class A misdemeanor, and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (Penal Law, § 165.45), a class E felony.

On February 28, 1983, respondent was sentenced on each count to an intermittent term of imprisonment for the period of six months, to be served on weekends, the sentences to run concurrently.

Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

[326]*326Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION of the court

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on June 21, 1967, under the name of William F. Treuber.

On December 9, 1982, in the Supreme Court, New York County, respondent was found guilty, after trial, of conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law, § 105.05), a class A misdemeanor, and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (Penal Law, § 165.45), a class E felony.

On February 28, 1983, respondent was sentenced on each count to an intermittent term of imprisonment for the period of six months, to be served on weekends, the sentences to run concurrently.

Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

[326]*326Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Bracken, JJ., concur.

In re Treuber, 94 A.D.2d 325, 464 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

94 A.D.2d 325 (In re Treuber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.