In re Trenticosta

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Trenticosta

157 So. 3d 1102, 2015 La. LEXIS 11, 2015 WL 303674

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 23, 2015

DocketNo. 2014-B-2557

StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 3d 1102 (In re Trenticosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Trenticosta, 157 So. 3d 1102, 2015 La. LEXIS 11, 2015 WL 303674 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint [1103]*1103petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he failed to provide competent representation to a client in a succession matter and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Nicholas J. Trenticosta, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18475, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint [1103]*1103petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he failed to provide competent representation to a client in a succession matter and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Nicholas J. Trenticosta, Louisiana Bar Roll number 18475, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 So. 3d 1102, 2015 La. LEXIS 11, 2015 WL 303674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trenticosta-la-2015.