In Re Trend Micro Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: April 2, 2012
• Docket: 2012-M119
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit IN RE TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, TREND MICRO, INC. (USA), CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD., CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND SYMANTEC CORP., Petition,ers. Misce11aneous Docket No. 119 On PetitioI1 for Writ of Manda1nus to the United States District Court for the District of De1aWare in case no. 10-CV-1067, Judge Leonard P. Stark. ON PETITION Before BRYsoN, MAYER, LINN, Circuit Ju,dges. PER CURIAM. 0 R D E R Trend Micro Inc0rporated, T1'end Micro, Inc. (USA), Check Point S0ftWare Techno1ogies Ltd., Check Point S0ftware Techno10gies, Inc., and Symantec Corp. (co11ec- tively, Trend Micro) seek a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the District of Dela- ware to vacate its order denying Trend Micro’s motion to

IN RE TREND MICRO INC 2 transfer venue, and to direct the De1aware district court to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ca1ifornia. We deem it the better course for Trend Micro to first move the district court for reconsideration of its order denying a transfer of venue in light of In re Link_A_Media Devices Corp., 662 F.3d 1221 (Fed. Cir. 2011). We there- fore deny Trend Micro’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to refiling 4 _ According1y, IT ls ORDERED THA'r: The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice FoR THE CofJRT APR 93 ?U1? 131 Jan H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y C1erk ccc C1ement S. Roberts, Esq. 1\/lark A. F1age1, Esq. Yarmea Ron:1an Chaikovsky, Esq. Joseph J. Farnan, III, Esq. Clerk, United States District C0urt For The District Of De1aware s2-4 11-lE FE!'JER!¥.L CIHCU1T APR U22I]1Z JAN HORBAL¥ Cl.EBK F|lJED u.s. count 0F APPEALs FOB