Home/New York Supreme Court/In re Treichel

In re Treichel

22 Misc. 2d 111, 202 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3173
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 14, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Misc. 2d 111 (In re Treichel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Treichel, 22 Misc. 2d 111, 202 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3173 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Mario Pittoni, J.

Application for an examination before commencement of the action for the purpose of determining whether a cause of action exists against other parties denied. An ex parte application of this character can only be granted if a cause of action is shown in the affidavits submitted. (Peterman v. Schpelman, 274 App. Div. 901; Matter of Dewhirst [Cohen], 4 Misc 2d 756 [Sup. Ct., Monroe County]; Matter of Jones, 6 Misc 2d 703 [Ct. Claims]; Lindquist v. Wm. Spencer & Son Corp., 65 N. Y. S. 2d 482 [Sup. Ct., Kings County].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterman v. Schpelman
274 A.D. 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
In re Dewhirst
4 Misc. 2d 756 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
In re Jones
6 Misc. 2d 703 (New York State Court of Claims, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 2d 111, 202 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-treichel-nysupct-1960.