In re Treadwell

California Supreme Court

In re Treadwell

4 P. 1192, 2 Cal. Unrep. 413

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 6, 1884

DocketNo. 9761

StatusPublished

This text of 4 P. 1192 (In re Treadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Treadwell, 4 P. 1192, 2 Cal. Unrep. 413 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

Without expressing any opinion upon the question whether this court could remove or suspend an attorney for causes other than those specified in section 287, Code of Civil Procedure, we have concluded in this case not to investigate the charges which, if proven, would not clearly constitute a cause for suspension or removal under the provisions of the code. Therefore, the objections to the charges growing out of respondent’s transactions with the Bank of Woodland and with Adolph Heine and wife, or either of them, [414]*414are sustained, and the specifications relating to said charges are ordered stricken out. And it is further ordered that the issue raised by respondent’s plea of not guilty to the remaining charge be referred to A. P. Gatlin, Esq., of Sacramento, to take testimony and report the same to this court with all convenient dispatch.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

Without expressing any opinion upon the question whether this court could remove or suspend an attorney for causes other than those specified in section 287, Code of Civil Procedure, we have concluded in this case not to investigate the charges which, if proven, would not clearly constitute a cause for suspension or removal under the provisions of the code. Therefore, the objections to the charges growing out of respondent’s transactions with the Bank of Woodland and with Adolph Heine and wife, or either of them, [414]*414are sustained, and the specifications relating to said charges are ordered stricken out. And it is further ordered that the issue raised by respondent’s plea of not guilty to the remaining charge be referred to A. P. Gatlin, Esq., of Sacramento, to take testimony and report the same to this court with all convenient dispatch.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 P. 1192, 2 Cal. Unrep. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-treadwell-cal-1884.