In re Traylor

Supreme Court

In re Traylor

134 S. Ct. 211, 187 L. Ed. 2d 271, 571 U.S. 815, 82 U.S.L.W. 3192, 2013 WL 3232337, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5176

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 7, 2013·No. No. 12–10998.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

In re Traylor, 134 S. Ct. 211, 187 L. Ed. 2d 271, 571 U.S. 815, 82 U.S.L.W. 3192, 2013 WL 3232337, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5176 (U.S. 2013).

Pincite

134 S. Ct. 211 (In re Traylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related