In re Travis V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Travis V.

45 A.D.3d 257, 843 N.Y.S.2d 829

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.3d 257 (In re Travis V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Travis V., 45 A.D.3d 257, 843 N.Y.S.2d 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about January 25, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, obstruction of governmental administration in the second degree, and resisting arrest, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The officer’s testimony established all the elements of the crimes at issue. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about January 25, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, obstruction of governmental administration in the second degree, and resisting arrest, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The officer’s testimony established all the elements of the crimes at issue. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 257, 843 N.Y.S.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-travis-v-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack