in Re: Travis Foster
This text of in Re: Travis Foster (in Re: Travis Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed August 15, 2016.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00781-CV
IN RE TRAVIS FOSTER, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15-00357
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart
Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which he seeks relief from
the denial of his petition in intervention and motion for leave to intervene in a SAPCR action
brought by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (“DFPS”). The facts and
issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
/Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
160781F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Travis Foster, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-travis-foster-texapp-2016.