In Re Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 7, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00508-CV ——————————— IN RE TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC., TRITON VOYAGER ASSET LEASING GMBH, TRITON VOYAGER ASSET LEASING GMBH, ASGARD US, AND BOE EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION LLC, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., Triton Voyager Asset
Leasing GmbH, Triton Voyager Asset Leasing GmbH, Asgard US, and BOE
Exploration & Production LLC have filed a petition for writ of mandamus
challenging the trial court’s June 2, 2023 order denying relators’ motion to compel the independent neuropsychological examinations of real parties in interest Jerry
Branton, Christopher Pleasant, Richard Rhodes, and Montie Watkins.1 In their
mandamus petition, relators requested that the Court issue a writ of mandamus and
direct the trial court to “vacate [its] order of June 2, 2023” and order real parties in
interest “to submit to an independent neuropsychological examination.”
On October 16, 2023, relators filed a motion to dismiss their petition for writ
of mandamus. In the motion, relators state that “[w]hile this original proceeding was
pending,” real parties in interest withdrew their objections to the requested
independent neuropsychological examinations. In turn, the trial court “entered a
new order granting [relators’] motion in part and effectively withdrawing the
complained-of order.” Relators’ motion further states that the trial court’s new
“order largely moots the petition” for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, relators
requested that the Court dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus.
Relators’ motion does not include a certificate of conference, but more than
ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has opposed the relief
requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
1 The underlying case is In re Hurricane Zeta Litigation, Cause No. 2022-36264, in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier presiding. 2 Accordingly, we grant relators’ motion and dismiss the petition for writ of
mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-transocean-offshore-deepwater-drilling-inc-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.