In re Transki

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Transki

753 N.E.2d 1283, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 746, 2001 WL 959405

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 21, 2001

DocketNo. 46S00-0106-DI-290

StatusPublished

This text of 753 N.E.2d 1283 (In re Transki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Transki, 753 N.E.2d 1283, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 746, 2001 WL 959405 (Ind. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f), petitions this Court to direct the respondent, Barbara Aun Transki, to show cause why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to respond to the Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against her and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent should be ordered to show cause to this Court why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to submit to the Commission a written response to pending allegations of professional misconduct and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(f), the respondent, Barbara Ann Transki, is hereby directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Disciplinary Com[1284]*1284mission a written response to pending allegations of misconduct and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to serve a certified copy of this order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to her personally, or by sending to her a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event the personal service or service by registered or certified mail cannot be obtained upon the respondent, a certified copy of this Order shall be served on the Clerk of this Court as agent for the respondent as provided in Admis.Disc.R. 23(12)(h).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f), petitions this Court to direct the respondent, Barbara Aun Transki, to show cause why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to respond to the Commission's demands for a response to a grievance filed against her and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Commission's petition should be granted. Accordingly, we find that the respondent should be ordered to show cause to this Court why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to submit to the Commission a written response to pending allegations of professional misconduct and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(f), the respondent, Barbara Ann Transki, is hereby directed to show cause in writing, within 10 days of service of this order, why she should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state due to his failure to submit to the Disciplinary Com[1284]*1284mission a written response to pending allegations of misconduct and her failure to accept certified mail from the Commission that requires a written response and that is sent to the respondent's official address of record with the Clerk of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to serve a certified copy of this order upon the respondent by delivering a copy to her personally, or by sending to her a certified copy of it by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event the personal service or service by registered or certified mail cannot be obtained upon the respondent, a certified copy of this Order shall be served on the Clerk of this Court as agent for the respondent as provided in Admis.Disc.R. 23(12)(h).

All Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 N.E.2d 1283, 2001 Ind. LEXIS 746, 2001 WL 959405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-transki-ind-2001.