In Re Transfer to Incapacitated Status of Edwardon

2004 ND 17, 673 N.W.2d 644, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 16, 2004 WL 78662
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 20, 2004
Docket20030331
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2004 ND 17 (In Re Transfer to Incapacitated Status of Edwardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Transfer to Incapacitated Status of Edwardon, 2004 ND 17, 673 N.W.2d 644, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 16, 2004 WL 78662 (N.D. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Debra K. Edwardson was served a Summons and Petition for Discipline by publication on May 24, May 31, and June 7, 2003.

[¶ 2] The Petition asserts that Debra K. Edwardson was admitted to practice law in the courts of North Dakota on September 22, 1995. Edwardson’s license to practice law was suspended on July 11, 2002, and she is not currently licensed.

[¶ 3] The Petition asserts that Edward-son represented Randy Ballard through the trial and appeal of a criminal matter. See State v. Ballard, 2001 ND 161, 639 N.W.2d 706. Subsequently, Tom Slorby was appointed to represent Ballard in a post-conviction relief matter. Slorby made several requests to Edwardson for Ballard’s file; however, Edwardson did not respond to Slorby’s requests.

[¶ 4] The Petition further asserts that Edwardson violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.16(e), Declining or Terminating Representation, which provides that upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests, including surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled, N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(e) and N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 1.2A(8), regarding engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 3.1D(3) which requires a lawyer to make a written response to a disciplinary complaint.

[¶ 5] On November 12, 2003, the Hearing Panel filed its Report. The Hearing Panel concluded that a violation of the rules as alleged in the Petition has occurred. However, the Hearing Panel further concluded that there is concern about Edwardson’s ability and capacity to practice law. The Hearing Panel recommended that Edwardson be transferred to disability inactive status until the Court considers a petition for transfer to active status.

[¶ 6] The Report of the Hearing Panel was referred to the Court under N.D.R. *645 Lawyer Discipl. 5.1. The Court considered the matter, and

[¶ 7] ORDERED, the Report of the Hearing Panel is accepted, and Debra K. Edwardson is transferred to disability inactive status until further order.

[¶ 8] FURTHER ORDERED, that formal proceedings be initiated as to whether Debra K. Edwardson should be transferred to incapacitated status.

[¶ 9] FURTHER ORDERED, Debra K. Edwardson comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3(F).

[¶ 10] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Reciprocal Discipline of Haderlie
2016 ND 189 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 ND 17, 673 N.W.2d 644, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 16, 2004 WL 78662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-transfer-to-incapacitated-status-of-edwardon-nd-2004.