In Re Transfer to Disability Inactive Status of Gegen

706 N.W.2d 763, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 761, 2005 WL 3313022
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 1, 2005
DocketA05-2331
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 706 N.W.2d 763 (In Re Transfer to Disability Inactive Status of Gegen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Transfer to Disability Inactive Status of Gegen, 706 N.W.2d 763, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 761, 2005 WL 3313022 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director), and respondent Nicholas J. Gegen have entered into a stipulation for transfer of respondent to disability inactive status under Rule 28(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), without further proceedings, coupled with a stay of a pending disciplinary investigation concerning respondent. The stipulation and a petition for transfer to disability inactive status have been filed in the above-entitled matter. Respondent is not currently practicing law.

The court has reviewed the petition and stipulation and concludes that transfer to disability inactive status and a stay of the pending disciplinary proceedings are appropriate.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective immediately respondent Nicholas J. Gegen is transferred to disability inactive status under Rule 28, RLPR. Respondent shall arrange to comply with the notice requirements of Rules 26(a)-(c), RLPR. During the period respondent is on disability inactive status, respondent may not render legal advice, discuss legal matters with clients, or otherwise engage in the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pending disciplinary proceedings concerning respondent are stayed until such time as respondent petitions for reinstatement to the practice of law under Rule 28(d) and Rule 18, RLPR. Upon filing of a petition for reinstatement, the stay of the disciplinary proceedings will automatically be lifted, and in addition to the requirements of Rules 28(d) and 18 the reinstatement proceedings will involve a determination whether discipline is warranted. In addition, reinstatement is further subject to *764 the conditions relating to testing for substance abuse and expert evidence concerning respondent’s psychological fitness to resume the practice of law contained in the stipulation filed with this court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Gegen
753 N.W.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2008)
State v. Edwards
736 N.W.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 N.W.2d 763, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 761, 2005 WL 3313022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-transfer-to-disability-inactive-status-of-gegen-minn-2005.