In re Tracy
24 F. Cas. 112, 1 Chi. Leg. News 123, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 298, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128
Opinion
The specification filed by Sarah J. Irwin, executrix, is only to the effect that the debt due to her by Tracy and Wilson, was created while they were acting in a fiduciary character. This is no ground for withholding a discharge. She must show the fact in reply to a plea of the discharge in a suit on her claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Tracy, 24 F. Cas. 112, 1 Chi. Leg. News 123, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 298, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128 (S.D.N.Y. 1868).
24 F. Cas. 112 (In re Tracy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Thomas
92 F. 912 (S.D. Iowa, 1899)