In re Tracy
24 F. Cas. 112, 1 Chi. Leg. News 123, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 298, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128
This text of 24 F. Cas. 112 (In re Tracy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Tracy, 24 F. Cas. 112, 1 Chi. Leg. News 123, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 298, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128 (S.D.N.Y. 1868).
Opinion
The specification filed by Sarah J. Irwin, executrix, is only to the effect that the debt due to her by Tracy and Wilson, was created while they were acting in a fiduciary character. This is no ground for withholding a discharge. She must show the fact in reply to a plea of the discharge in a suit on her claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Thomas
92 F. 912 (S.D. Iowa, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 112, 1 Chi. Leg. News 123, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 298, 1868 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tracy-nysd-1868.