In re Tracy

218 A.D.2d 48, 636 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14360
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court [49]*49on February 20, 1973 and formerly maintained an office in Buffalo. On September 12, 1995, he was convicted, following a jury trial, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York of the crimes of conspiracy and filing a false written statement with the United States Attorney’s Office, in violation of 18 USC §§ 371,1001 and 1002. On September 27,1995, respondent was suspended pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f) and was directed to show cause why a final order of disbarment should not be entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g).

Respondent appeared on the return date of the show cause order and submitted an affidavit asserting that the equivalent New York State offense was the misdemeanor of offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree (Penal Law § 175.30). We conclude, however, that the equivalent New York State offense is the class E felony of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.35; see, Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490, 494; Matter of Knoll, 181 AD2d 136).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (e), respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony (see, Matter of Napoli, 177 AD2d 135), and we direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ., concur.

Order of disbarment entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tracy, 218 A.D.2d 48, 636 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

218 A.D.2d 48 (In re Tracy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Trammell
240 A.D.2d 90 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)