in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 4, 2011
Docket13-11-00157-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca (in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00157-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG


IN RE TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP D/B/A

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY #1104,

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, AND VICTOR FONSECA


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam[1]

Relators, Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP d/b/a Tractor Supply Company #1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on March 22, 2011.  The parties to this original proceeding have now filed an “Agreed Motion to Dismiss in Aid of Settlement.”  According to this motion, the parties have fully and finally compromised and settled all matters of fact and things in controversy between them.  Accordingly, the parties request that we dismiss this original proceeding with prejudice. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISMISS this original proceeding with prejudice.

It is so ORDERED.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

the 4th day of May, 2011.



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, Lp D/B/A Tractor Supply Company 1104, Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tractor-supply-co-of-texas-lp-dba-tractor-su-texapp-2011.