in Re: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 24, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00839-CV
IN RE TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. AND TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15296
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend the trial
court “effectively denied” a motion for protective order and has proceeded to trial. To be entitled
to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion
and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,
135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have
not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ
of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines
relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE 180839F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation (in Re: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.