In re Tousant
This text of 735 So. 2d 627 (In re Tousant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this joint petition, respondent, Katherine Thompson Tousant, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) move to transfer respondent to disability inactive status. The petition alleges that respondent is currently suffering from “an emotional disability with chronic, severe depression,” but no supporting evidence is attached. Inasmuch as the court must make the determination of the claim of [628]*628incapacity when a lawyer files a petition for transfer (solely or jointly with disciplinary counsel) during the course of a disciplinary proceeding,1 evidence of incapacity should be filed with a petition for transfer.
Subsequent to the filing of the petition, we ordered the ODC to supplement the record with a copy of the report of respondent’s psychiatrist. Based on this supplementation, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to justify a transfer to disability inactive status pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22.
Accordingly, it is ordered that Katherine Thompson Tousant be transferred to disability inactive status pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26 E, this order shall be effective immediately.
Kimball, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
735 So. 2d 627, 1999 La. LEXIS 1603, 1999 WL 373860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tousant-la-1999.