In re Toshea C.J.

62 A.D.3d 587, 880 N.Y.S.2d 36
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 587 (In re Toshea C.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Toshea C.J., 62 A.D.3d 587, 880 N.Y.S.2d 36 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J), entered on or about March 6, 2007, which, inter alia, respectively found that respondent mother permanently neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s argument that the agency’s petitions were jurisdictionally defective for failing to specify the diligent efforts the agency made to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (Family Ct Act § 614 [1] [c]) was raised for the first time on appeal and is therefore unpreserved (see Matter of Gina Rachel L., 44 AD3d 367 [2007]). Were we to review this issue, we would find that the petitions sufficiently specified the agency’s efforts, which included arranging for respondent to visit with the children, referring respondent for individual and family counseling and training in parenting skills, and encouraging respondent “to become consistent with both her planning for and engaging in meaningful visits with” the children.

The court’s finding that the agency fulfilled its statutory duty to make diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship was supported by clear and convincing evidence that the agency sought respondent’s cooperation in developing a plan tailored to respondent’s needs, and, inter alia, scheduled visitation, attempted to assist her in improving the quality of the visits, and referred her to parenting skills classes and counseling programs (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [f]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368 [1984]). Respondent testified that the agency provided her with no referrals. However, her caseworker testified that the agency tried to make referrals and respondent refused to accept them. The court’s determination that the caseworker’s testimony was credible and respondent’s incredible is entitled to deference (see Matter of Amin Enrique M., 52 AD3d 316 [2008]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Nardelli, Acosta and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Raul R. (III) v. Raul R.
2021 NY Slip Op 06566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Lamani C.H. (Lucia T.G.)
2020 NY Slip Op 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Daniel P. (Noheme P.--David P.)
2020 NY Slip Op 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Giovanni H.B. (Henry B.--Orissa B.)
2019 NY Slip Op 3680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Isaac C. (Cristina C.--Anthony C.)
2018 NY Slip Op 1244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Cerenithy B. (Ecksthine B.)
2017 NY Slip Op 3126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Jahnel B. (Carlene Elizabeth B.)
143 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
JASCO, JANIE v. ALVIRA, DAVID
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Jasco v. Alvira
107 A.D.3d 1460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Ashley R.
103 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Louis N.
98 A.D.3d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Clayton T.
95 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Enrique C.
79 A.D.3d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Ana M.G.
74 A.D.3d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Emily W.
67 A.D.3d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 587, 880 N.Y.S.2d 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-toshea-cj-nyappdiv-2009.