In re Torres
78 N.Y.2d 1085
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (166 AD2d 228), and certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Torres, 78 N.Y.2d 1085 (N.Y. 1991).
78 N.Y.2d 1085 (In re Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laura v. Ship
299 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Francis v. James Stone
221 F.3d 100 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Francis S. v. Stone
221 F.3d 100 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Francis S. v. Stone
995 F. Supp. 368 (S.D. New York, 1998)
In re Michael RR.
233 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Matter of Francis S.
663 N.E.2d 881 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Matter of George L.
648 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
In re Francis S.
206 A.D.2d 4 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)