In re Tordsen

287 A.D.2d 935, 731 N.Y.S.2d 678, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9958
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 25, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 935 (In re Tordsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tordsen, 287 A.D.2d 935, 731 N.Y.S.2d 678, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9958 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 9, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

[936]*936Claimant was discharged from her employment as a social worker for a dialysis center after she left work early without authorization. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct. It is well established that a claimant’s unauthorized absences from work may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Williams [Commissioner of Labor], 274 AD2d 805; Matter of Patrick [La Salle School — Commissioner of Labor], 251 AD2d 944). Claimant’s differing version of the events surrounding her termination presented a credibility issue which the Board resolved against her (see, Matter of Conforti [Commissioner of Labor], 268 AD2d 663; Matter of Patrick [La Salle School — Commissioner of Labor], supra).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Sedlack
40 A.D.3d 1235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Claim of Shayo
4 A.D.3d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Owens
306 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Unterman
293 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 A.D.2d 935, 731 N.Y.S.2d 678, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tordsen-nyappdiv-2001.