In re Topas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Topas

89 A.3d 583, 217 N.J. 363, 2014 WL 2048009, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 479

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 16, 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-266, concluding that the violations by REUEL E. TOPAS of LAKEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, of RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to a third person any funds that the person is entitled to receive), and R. 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations) are de minimis and undeserving of formal discipline and that the formal complaint in Docket No. XIV-2011-0644E therefore should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against REUEL E. TOPAS in Docket No. XIV-2011-0644E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-266, concluding that the violations by REUEL E. TOPAS of LAKEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, of RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to a third person any funds that the person is entitled to receive), and R. 1:21-6 and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations) are de minimis and undeserving of formal discipline and that the formal complaint in Docket No. XIV-2011-0644E therefore should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against REUEL E. TOPAS in Docket No. XIV-2011-0644E is hereby dismissed.

In re Topas, 89 A.3d 583, 217 N.J. 363, 2014 WL 2048009, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 479 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

89 A.3d 583 (In re Topas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.