In re Tootle

511 S.E.2d 687, 334 S.C. 20, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 20
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 25, 1999
DocketNo. 24887
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 S.E.2d 687 (In re Tootle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tootle, 511 S.E.2d 687, 334 S.C. 20, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 20 (S.C. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension. We accept the agreement.

[21]*21Respondent pled guilty to one count of failure to make and file a South Carolina Income Tax return in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 12-54-40(b)(6)(c) (Supp.1997). Respondent was sentenced to ninety days in prison, suspended upon the payment of a $400.00 fine.

The failure to file a tax return is a serious crime as set forth in Rule 2(z), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. By his conduct, respondent has violated Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, and Rule 7(a)(4), RLDE, by committing a serious crime that reflects adversely upon his honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer and has violated Rule 7(a)(5) and (6), RLDE, by engaging in conduct tending to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute and violating the oath of office he took upon admission to the practice of law in this State.

In our opinion, respondent’s misconduct warrants a definite suspension from the practice of law for ninety days. Accordingly, respondent is suspended for ninety days, retroactive to December 1, 1998, the date of his interim suspension. Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

DEFINITE SUSPENSION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byrd v. the Mississippi Bar
826 So. 2d 1249 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 S.E.2d 687, 334 S.C. 20, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tootle-sc-1999.