In Re Tonya Grubbs v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2024
Docket14-24-00063-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Tonya Grubbs v. the State of Texas (In Re Tonya Grubbs v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Tonya Grubbs v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Motions Dismissed as Moot; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00063-CV

IN RE TONYA GRUBBS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Justice of the Peace Court, Precinct 1, Place 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 221200119772

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 26, 2024, relator Tonya Grubbs filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Steven Duble, presiding Justice of the Peace Court, Precint 1, Place 2, of Harris County, to vacate a January 18, 2023 order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 503.2.

On January 29, 2024, this court notified relator that this mandamus proceeding would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless relator established by February 12, 2024 this court’s jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b)-(c); see also In re Castro, No. 02-23-00489-CV, 2024 WL 23627, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 2, 2024, orig. proceeding) (mem. op) (per curiam) (dismissing mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction over justice of the peace).

On February 12, 2024, relator filed a “petition to establish the court of appeals jurisdiction.” Relator concedes that she “cannot find any precedent for when a Court of Appeals has issued a writ to a justice of the peace,” but argues that this court should “accept jurisdiction.” Because this court lacks mandamus jurisdiction over a justice of the peace, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. See id. Additionally, relator’s motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Tonya Grubbs v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tonya-grubbs-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.