in Re: Tommy Ray King
This text of in Re: Tommy Ray King (in Re: Tommy Ray King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed October 12, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01051-CV
IN RE TOMMY RAY KING, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-55339-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Relator Tommy Ray King seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court
to rule on relator’s motion to appoint counsel. To be entitled to mandamus relief in
a criminal case, relator must show (1) he has no adequate remedy at law, and (2)
what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d
117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). Relator bears the burden to
provide the Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to relief. Walker v.
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Relator has not provided this Court with a record establishing his right to
relief, and his petition does not comply with several of the requirements set out in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. Accordingly,
we deny the petition.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
221051F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Tommy Ray King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tommy-ray-king-texapp-2022.