In Re Tommisene Baker, Adult Ward
This text of In Re Tommisene Baker, Adult Ward (In Re Tommisene Baker, Adult Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 22, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21A0766. IN RE TOMMISENE BAKER, ADULT WARD.
Alma R. Carter filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order appointing King D. Heath as conservator for Tommisene Baker.1 Heath has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that Carter lacks standing to appeal. We agree. “It is well settled that only a party to the case can appeal from a judgment, or one who has sought to become a party as by way of intervention and has been denied the right to do so.” Degussa Wall Sys., Inc. v. Sharp, 286 Ga. App. 349, 350 (648 SE2d 687) (2007); see also Lockey v. Bennett, 244 Ga. 339, 340 (2) (260 SE2d 56) (1979). Here, the record shows that Carter and Heath are both siblings of the proposed ward. Carter was aware that Heath had filed a petition to be appointed conservator, and she was served notice of the hearing. There is nothing in the record, however, showing that Carter ever sought – or was denied the opportunity – to intervene below. Carter is thus not entitled to appeal. See Coffield v. Kuperman, 269 Ga. App. 432, 434 (604 SE2d 288) (2004). Accordingly, Heath’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
1 In her notice of appeal, Carter also purports to appeal a September 10, 2020 order finding that she was not a party to the case. The record contains no such order. The hearing took place on September 10, 2020. The trial court may have made an oral ruling at the hearing; however, the transcript from the hearing was not included with the record. Moreover, a ruling ordinarily must be reduced to writing in order to appeal. See Mondy v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, 303 Ga. 764, 772 (4) (b) (815 SE2d 70) (2018). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/22/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Tommisene Baker, Adult Ward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tommisene-baker-adult-ward-gactapp-2021.