in Re Tomas Espinosa and Martha Espinosa
This text of in Re Tomas Espinosa and Martha Espinosa (in Re Tomas Espinosa and Martha Espinosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00246-CV
IN RE TOMAS ESPINOSA AND RELATORS MARTHA ESPINOSA
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
GABRIEL, J. would request a response.
DELIVERED: July 29, 2013
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tomas Espinosa and Martha Espinosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tomas-espinosa-and-martha-espinosa-texapp-2013.