in Re: Tom and Mary Jane Dickson and Bushwacker, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 2002
Docket01-02-00336-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Tom and Mary Jane Dickson and Bushwacker, Inc. (in Re: Tom and Mary Jane Dickson and Bushwacker, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Tom and Mary Jane Dickson and Bushwacker, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 23, 2002





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00336-CV



IN RE TOM DICKSON, MARY JANE DICKSON, AND BUSHWACKER, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



O P I N I O N

Relators, Tom Dickson, Mary Jane Dickson, and Bushwacker, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Wainwright (1) abused his discretion when he signed an order on March 15, 2002, directing Bushwacker, Inc. to produce (1) all financial statements of any type submitted by the Dicksons to the IRS or anyone else, (2) the Dicksons' tax returns for 1998 through the present, and (3) documents regarding profitability of Bushwacker, the value of Bushwacker and the alleged lost business value of Bushwacker, including but not limited to all documents showing valuations of Bushwacker by its owners and all documents regarding profitability of Bushwacker and the income received by its owners.

The Court has reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus, the response thereto, and the reply thereto. (2) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Hedges, and Jennings.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.



1.

The Honorable Dale Wainwright, judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The underlying suit is Bushwacker, Inc. v. Trammel Crow Company, Trammel Crow Houston, Ltd., and Woodlake RPFII Limited Partnership, trial court cause no, 1999-29538.

2.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to file the reply even though it was received after the deadline set by this Court's order of April 18, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Tom and Mary Jane Dickson and Bushwacker, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tom-and-mary-jane-dickson-and-bushwacker-inc-texapp-2002.