In re Tolosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tolosky

31 A.D.2d 578, 295 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 578 (In re Tolosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tolosky, 31 A.D.2d 578, 295 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Hew York State Bar Association. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on Hovember 8, 1956 at a term of the Appellate Division in the Third Judicial Department. The Referee has found respondent guilty of issuing worthless checks. The record indicates that respondent has absconded. The proof of guilt is clear, and the Referee’s report is hereby confirmed. Respondent disbarred, with leave to apply to defend himself against the charges within one year from the date of the order entered hereon as provided by subdivision 6 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Hew York State Bar Association. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on Hovember 8, 1956 at a term of the Appellate Division in the Third Judicial Department. The Referee has found respondent guilty of issuing worthless checks. The record indicates that respondent has absconded. The proof of guilt is clear, and the Referee’s report is hereby confirmed. Respondent disbarred, with leave to apply to defend himself against the charges within one year from the date of the order entered hereon as provided by subdivision 6 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 578, 295 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tolosky-nyappdiv-1968.