In re Toll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Toll

869 A.2d 974

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 11, 2005

DocketNo. 636 Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 869 A.2d 974 (In re Toll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Toll, 869 A.2d 974 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 29, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 29, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 A.2d 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-toll-pa-2005.