in Re Todd Warren Altschul
This text of in Re Todd Warren Altschul (in Re Todd Warren Altschul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NO. 03-17-00416-CV
In re Todd Warren Altschul
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We withdraw our opinion of June 30, 2017, and substitute the following opinion in
its place. Relator’s motion for rehearing is denied.
Relator Todd Warren Altschul filed a petition for writ of mandamus on June 22, 2017
directed to Travis County District Clerk Velva L. Price. On June 28, 2017, as our prior opinion was
processing, Altschul filed a supplement to his mandamus petition.1 The prior opinion dismissed
Altschul’s petition because we lack jurisdiction to issue mandamus against the district clerk.
Altschul’s supplemental petition added a request for a writ of mandamus directed to “the [unnamed]
district judge of Travis Co., Tx.” On rehearing, Altschul acknowledges that we may issue writs of
mandamus only against a district judge or county judge sitting in our district, or to enforce our
jurisdiction; thus, he re-focuses his request for mandamus relief to “a district judge in Travis Co.,
1 Relator’s motion for rehearing complains that his “Supplement to Petition for Writ of Mandamus” was not considered before our opinion issued. The supplement was not immediately posted because of the Texas Courts’ internal computer system outage on June 28, 2017. We consider the supplement on rehearing. Tx.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; In re Simpson, 997 S.W.2d 939, 939 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999,
orig. proceeding); In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 936 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999,
orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig.
proceeding).
Because Altschul has failed to demonstrate his entitlement to mandamus relief, his
petition for writ of mandamus and its supplement are denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3, 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Bourland
Denied on Rehearing
Filed: July 19, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Todd Warren Altschul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-todd-warren-altschul-texapp-2017.