in Re Todd Warren Altschul

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 6, 2007·No. 01-07-00439-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 6, 2007



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-07-00439-CR


IN RE TODD WARREN ALTSCHUL, Relator






Original Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator, Todd Warren Altschul, petitions this Court for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004). This Court has no jurisdiction to hear a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in felony cases. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

               In support of his petition, relator erroneously relies on Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Padilla held that when it and a court of appeals have concurrent original jurisdiction of a petition for writ of mandamus against the judge of a district or county court, the petition should be presented first to the court of appeals. Id. at 808. In this proceeding, relator is not requesting mandamus relief, but habeas corpus relief.

               Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction and deny all requested relief.

PER CURIAM


Panel consists of Justices Taft, Jennings, and Alcala.


Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Todd Warren Altschul, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

in Re Todd Warren Altschul (in Re Todd Warren Altschul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Padilla v. McDaniel
122 S.W.3d 805 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)