in Re: Todd Altschul

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2004
Docket01-03-01327-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Todd Altschul (in Re: Todd Altschul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Todd Altschul, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 29, 2004





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NOS. 01-03-01324-CR

          01-03-01327-CR

          01-03-01328-CR


IN RE TODD ALTSCHUL, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator, Todd Altschul, requests that this Court compel respondent to reconstruct “missing indictments and judgments” in cause numbers 23557, 26672, and 26673. Relator contends that respondent had a ministerial duty to preserve court records. Relator argues that the reconstructed documents would show that his punishment was erroneously enhanced.

               District court judges do not have a duty to preserve court records. District clerks have custody of all records lawfully deposited in the clerk’s office. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.303 (Vernon 1998).

               The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

               It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM


Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Alcala, and Hanks.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Todd Altschul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-todd-altschul-texapp-2004.