In re Tobin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Tobin

891 A.2d 612, 186 N.J. 67, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 31

DecidedFebruary 9, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 612 (In re Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tobin, 891 A.2d 612, 186 N.J. 67, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 31 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-291, concluding that IRVING TOBIN of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1957, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(c)(a lawyer shall not prepare an instrument giving the lawyer any substantial gift from a client, including a testamentary gift, except where the client is related to the lawyer);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that IRVING TOBIN is hereby censured; and it is further

[68]*68ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI