In re Tobin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Tobin

784 A.2d 73, 170 N.J. 74, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1408

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-156, concluding that IRVING TOBIN of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1957, should be reprimanded for violating DR 5-105, RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest); DR 5-101, DR 5-104, RPC 1.8(a)(business transaction with client); DR 1-102(A)(4) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safeguard; funds, resulting in negligent misappropriation of client funds); DR 9-102(A) and (C), RPC 1.15(a) and (d); R. 1:21-6(a)(l)(commingling of funds belonging to investors, including respondent, and clients’ funds); and i?.l:21-6(b)(8) and ^(record-keeping violations);

And good cause appearing;

[75]*75It is ORDERED that IRVING TOBIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-156, concluding that IRVING TOBIN of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1957, should be reprimanded for violating DR 5-105, RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest); DR 5-101, DR 5-104, RPC 1.8(a)(business transaction with client); DR 1-102(A)(4) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safeguard; funds, resulting in negligent misappropriation of client funds); DR 9-102(A) and (C), RPC 1.15(a) and (d); R. 1:21-6(a)(l)(commingling of funds belonging to investors, including respondent, and clients’ funds); and i?.l:21-6(b)(8) and ^(record-keeping violations);

And good cause appearing;

[75]*75It is ORDERED that IRVING TOBIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Tobin, 784 A.2d 73, 170 N.J. 74, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1408 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

784 A.2d 73 (In re Tobin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related