In re Tobin
This text of 784 A.2d 73 (In re Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-156, concluding that IRVING TOBIN of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1957, should be reprimanded for violating DR 5-105, RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest); DR 5-101, DR 5-104, RPC 1.8(a)(business transaction with client); DR 1-102(A)(4) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safeguard; funds, resulting in negligent misappropriation of client funds); DR 9-102(A) and (C), RPC 1.15(a) and (d); R. 1:21-6(a)(l)(commingling of funds belonging to investors, including respondent, and clients’ funds); and i?.l:21-6(b)(8) and ^(record-keeping violations);
And good cause appearing;
[75]*75It is ORDERED that IRVING TOBIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
784 A.2d 73, 170 N.J. 74, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tobin-nj-2001.