In re to Require Roth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re to Require Roth

156 A.D. 893, 141 N.Y.S. 316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 A.D. 893 (In re to Require Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re to Require Roth, 156 A.D. 893, 141 N.Y.S. 316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The: order appealed from should be modified by referring the matter to the referee therein named to take and state the account of Herman L. Roth with respect to the payment and disbursement by him of the sum of $4,081.84 to andón account of the said Grace V. Grosz, and also to take the proof offered in relation to the services rendered by the appellant and the value thereof, and as to the circumstances surrounding the execution of the so-called retainer; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The: order appealed from should be modified by referring the matter to the referee therein named to take and state the account of Herman L. Roth with respect to the payment and disbursement by him of the sum of $4,081.84 to andón account of the said Grace V. Grosz, and also to take the proof offered in relation to the services rendered by the appellant and the value thereof, and as to the circumstances surrounding the execution of the so-called retainer; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D. 893, 141 N.Y.S. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-to-require-roth-nyappdiv-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack