in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC

DecidedFebruary 23, 2015

Docket01-15-00126-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC (in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.; TitleMax of Texas, Inc.; and TMX Finance LLC

Appellate case number: 01-15-00126-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-33584

Trial court: 152nd Judicial District Court of Harris County

On December 4, 2014, this Court granted the motion for temporary relief filed by the above relators to stay all trial court orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of their CEO Tracy Young, until this Court resolved their petition for a writ of mandamus under No. 01-14-00964-CV. Now on February 11, 2015, relators filed a new mandamus petition requesting that this Court order the trial court to: (1) vacate its January 23, 2015 oral ruling compelling the apex deposition of their COO Otto Bielss; and (2) grant relators’ January 13, 2015 motion for protection from the apex deposition of Mr. Bielss. On February 12, 2015, relators filed an amended unopposed motion for temporary relief requesting that we similarly stay all trial court orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of Mr. Bielss until this Court resolves their new mandamus petition. Accordingly, we grant the relator’s motion and ORDER that all orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of relators’ COO Otto Bielss in the above-referenced trial court case are stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. Any party may move for reconsideration of the stay. See id. at 52.10(c). Further, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by the real parties in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be due within 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: February 19, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.; TitleMax of Texas, Inc.; and TMX Finance LLC

Appellate case number: 01-15-00126-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-33584

Trial court: 152nd Judicial District Court of Harris County

On December 4, 2014, this Court granted the motion for temporary relief filed by the above relators to stay all trial court orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of their CEO Tracy Young, until this Court resolved their petition for a writ of mandamus under No. 01-14-00964-CV. Now on February 11, 2015, relators filed a new mandamus petition requesting that this Court order the trial court to: (1) vacate its January 23, 2015 oral ruling compelling the apex deposition of their COO Otto Bielss; and (2) grant relators’ January 13, 2015 motion for protection from the apex deposition of Mr. Bielss. On February 12, 2015, relators filed an amended unopposed motion for temporary relief requesting that we similarly stay all trial court orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of Mr. Bielss until this Court resolves their new mandamus petition. Accordingly, we grant the relator’s motion and ORDER that all orders and rulings regarding the apex deposition of relators’ COO Otto Bielss in the above-referenced trial court case are stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. Any party may move for reconsideration of the stay. See id. at 52.10(c). Further, the Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by the real parties in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be due within 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: February 19, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc.TitleMax of Texas, Inc.TMX Finance LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tmx-finance-of-texas-inctitlemax-of-texas-in-texapp-2015.