In re T.M.
940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530
This text of 940 N.E.2d 984 (In re T.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re T.M., 940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530 (Ohio 2011).
Opinion
Lucas App. Nos. L-10-1245 and L-10-1246, 2010-Ohio-5506. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 4-5 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment filed November 8, 2010:
“Do the delayed appeal provisions of App.R. 5 extend to cases involving the termination of parental rights and privileges?”
The conflict case is In re Westfall Children, Stark App. No. 2006 CA 00196, 2006-Ohio-6717.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Matter of Westfall, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2006)
2006 Ohio 6717 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
940 N.E.2d 984, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tm-ohio-2011.