In re Tisnique B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tisnique B.

245 A.D.2d 152, 665 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 152 (In re Tisnique B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tisnique B., 245 A.D.2d 152, 665 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about March 22, 1995, terminating respondents’ parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of permanent neglect, and committing their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondents failed to plan for the future of their children despite petitioner’s appropriately diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationships. Family Court also properly found that the children’s best interests would be served by terminating respondents’ parental rights and freeing the children for adoption. There is no merit to respondents’ argument that the instant neglect proceedings should have been dismissed because it was instituted after the order of placement had lapsed (Matter of Mickey B., 65 AD2d 603). We have considered respondents’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about March 22, 1995, terminating respondents’ parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of permanent neglect, and committing their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondents failed to plan for the future of their children despite petitioner’s appropriately diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationships. Family Court also properly found that the children’s best interests would be served by terminating respondents’ parental rights and freeing the children for adoption. There is no merit to respondents’ argument that the instant neglect proceedings should have been dismissed because it was instituted after the order of placement had lapsed (Matter of Mickey B., 65 AD2d 603). We have considered respondents’ other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 152, 665 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tisnique-b-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack