in Re: Tina White
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed August 17, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00885-CV
IN RE TINA WHITE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-00919
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which she complains of the
trial court’s order quashing relator’s jury demand. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator
must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate
appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown an abuse of
discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief
sought).
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE 180885F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Tina White (in Re: Tina White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.