in Re Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine
This text of in Re Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine (in Re Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS
_____________________ _____
09-17-00423-CV _____________________ _____
In Re Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine
________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-08-09496-CV ________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine’s petition for writ of mandamus, concludes that the petition should be conditionally granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that the petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally granted and the trial court is to vacate its order of October 26, 2017, which stayed all discovery sought from Charles Michael Glaze by Tina and Gerald Fontaine. All costs of the mandamus proceeding are assessed against the real party in interest. Per Curiam Opinion December 14, 2017 PETITION CONDITIONALLY GRANTED ********** Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified for observance.
Carol Anne Harley Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tina Fontaine and Gerald Fontaine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tina-fontaine-and-gerald-fontaine-texapp-2017.