In Re Times Publishing Co.

267 N.W. 858, 276 Mich. 349, 1936 Mich. LEXIS 968
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1936
DocketDocket No. 32, Calendar No. 37,420.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 N.W. 858 (In Re Times Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Times Publishing Co., 267 N.W. 858, 276 Mich. 349, 1936 Mich. LEXIS 968 (Mich. 1936).

Opinion

Wiest, J.

A bill of complaint was filed in the circuit court for the county of Genesee, in chancery; a *350 temporary injunction issued and the papers suppressed by order of the circuit judge and, to that end, sealed in an envelope with public access thereto prevented. In some manner, not disclosed, reporters of defendant Times Publishing Company obtained full information relative to the allegations in the bill and published the same. Upon citation and hearing defendants were adjudged guilty of contempt of court in so publishing the suppressed matter and, by appeal, prosecute review.

The silence imposed did not and could not extend beyond the secrecy ordered. That secrecy remained unbroken by defendants. No silence upon the right of free speech or freedom of the press was or could be imposed if the subject-matter was obtained from any source outside of the court records. To hold otherwise would violate rights guaranteed to a free people.

It may be held that the court had control over its records and the publicity thereof until service of process or judicial action, although this should be sparingly exercised and only to ends commensurate with justifiable needs, but this power cannot be extended to curtailment of free speech or of the press upon information aliunde the records suppressed.

The case does not call for a dissertation upon the freedom of the press, and we decline to “carry coals to Newcastle.”

Upon the record before us defendants were not guilty of contempt of court, and the adjudication is reversed and they are freed therefrom.

North, C. J., and Fead, Bushnell, Edward M. Sharpe, and Toy, JJ., concurred. Butzel and Potter, JJ., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Midland Publishing Co.
362 N.W.2d 580 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 N.W. 858, 276 Mich. 349, 1936 Mich. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-times-publishing-co-mich-1936.