In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; And ByteDance Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 2, 2025·No. 15-25-00209-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 15-25-00209-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/2/2025 4:18 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00209-CV CLERK FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS15th COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS FOR THE FIFTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT12/2/2025 AUSTIN4:18:21 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk I N RE T IK T OK I NC ., T IK T OK L TD.; T IKTOK P TE .; TIK T OK U.S. D ATA S ECURITY I NC .; B YTE D ANCE L TD .; AND B YTE D ANCE , I NC ., RELATORS.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the 250th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-25-003118 Honorable Cory Liu, Presiding Judge

REAL PARTY IN INTEREST STATE OF TEXAS’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(3), the State of Texas, real party in

interest in this proceeding and Plaintiff in the Court below, respectfully requests

leave to file under seal unredacted responses to Relators’ motion for temporary

relief and petition for writ of mandamus. The State’s responses reference material

previously designated as confidential pursuant to the District Court’s Protective

Order. See Exhibit A, Protective Order, Texas v. TikTok, No. D-1-GN-25-003118

(Travis Cnty. Dist. Ct. Aug. 19, 2025). That Order requires the State to file under

seal any materials or information designated as confidential. Exhibit A ¶¶ 31, 62.

The Protective Order gives the designating party 14 days after the conclusion of

briefing to request that the material remain under seal; otherwise, the material may be made public. Id. ¶ 62. If the Court grants the State’s motion to file under

seal, the State will contemporaneously file public versions of its responses, with

only the material subject to the Protective Order redacted.

PRAYER

For the above reasons, the State prays that the Court allow it to file

under seal unredacted responses to Relators’ motion for temporary relief and

petition for writ of mandamus, along with public redacted versions.

DATED: December 2, 2025 Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON /s/ Richard R. McCutcheon Attorney General of Texas RICHARD R. McCUTCHEON State Bar No. 24139547 BRENT WEBSTER MADELINE FOGEL First Assistant Attorney General State Bar No. 24141985 Assistant Attorneys General RALPH MOLINA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY Deputy First Assistant GENERAL OF TEXAS Attorney General Consumer Protection Division 808 Travis Street, Suite 1520 AUSTIN KINGHORN Houston, Texas 77002 Deputy Attorney General for Tel: (713) 225-8922 Civil Litigation Fax: (713) 223-5821 Richard.McCutcheon@oag.texas.gov JOHNATHAN STONE Madeline.Fogel@oag.texas.gov Chief, Consumer Protection Division DAVID H. THOMPSON* BRIAN W. BARNES* JOHN D. OHLENDORF* COOPER & KIRK, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C., 20036 Telephone: (202) 220-9600 Facsimile: (202) 220-9601 dthompson@cooperkirk.com

2 *Pro Hac Vice admission forthcoming

JOHN C. HERNANDEZ Texas State Bar No. 24095819 Assistant Attorney General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Tel: (512) 463-2185 Fax: (512) 473-8301 JC.Hernandez@oag.texas.gov

ADAM HOLTZ State Bar No. 24143021 Assistant Attorney General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Consumer Protection Division 112 E. Pecan Street, Ste. 735 San Antonio. Texas 78205 Tel: (210) 225-4191 Fax: (210) 225-1072 Adam.Holtz@oag.texas.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Relators on December 2, 2025, via email in which counsel for Relators stated that Relators agree to filing under seal.

/s/ Richard R. McCutcheon Richard R. McCutcheon

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 2, 2025, a true and correct copy of this document was served upon all counsel of record via electronic filing service.

/s/ Richard R. McCutcheon Richard R. McCutcheon

4 EXHIBIT A 08/19/2025 05:20:47 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-25-003118 CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-25-003118

) STATE OF TEXAS, ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, ) ) TRAVIS COUNTY, v. ) TEXAS ) TIKTOK INC., TIKTOK LTD., TIKTOK ) PTE. LTD., TIKTOK U.S. DATA ) SECURITY INC., BYTEDANCE LTD., and ) 250th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BYTEDANCE INC., ) Defendants. )

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Whereas certain discovery materials in this case may qualify as confidential or highly

confidential information, and to prevent undue disclosure of any such information, the State and

Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”) have requested that the Court enter a Protective Order

(“Order”); and whereas the Court has determined that the terms set forth herein are appropriate to

protect the respective interests of the Parties and third parties; accordingly, it is HEREBY

ORDERED:

I. DEFINITIONS 1. Action: the above captioned action, including any amendments thereto, and any

related discovery, pretrial, trial, post-trial, or appellate proceedings. 2. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

3. CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection

under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.6.

4. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and In-House Counsel (as well as the 1 support staff).

5. Competitor: Any company that provides social media services or online

entertainment platforms that facilitate interactions between two or more distinct but

interdependent sets of users, and includes user-generated content, or any company

that reasonably may be considered to be in or as having plans to enter into this area, or any of their current officers, directors, employees, contractors, or agents. This

definition is only for purposes of determining whether a person serving as an Expert

(as defined below) in this case is eligible to obtain access to Protected Material, and

the Parties agree that this definition has no evidentiary value and will not be used

by the Parties or the Court for any substantive purposes in this case. 6. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or tangible

items that it has disclosed or produced as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

7. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among

other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or

generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this Action.

8. Expert: a person who has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an

expert witness or as an undisclosed consultant in this Action (as well as his or her employees and support staff). 9. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information or Items:

Protected Material the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would

create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive

means. 10. In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action, and their

support staff. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel. In-House

2 Counsel for the State means the Attorney General of Texas, attorneys of the Office

of the Attorney General of Texas, and their support staff (including but not limited

to attorneys, paralegals, secretaries, law clerks, and investigators).

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; And ByteDance Inc. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; And ByteDance Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; And ByteDance Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.