In Re Tiffany Ryder and Cynthia Vecera v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Tiffany Ryder and Cynthia Vecera v. the State of Texas (In Re Tiffany Ryder and Cynthia Vecera v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-24-00681-CV
IN RE Tiffany RYDER and Cynthia Vecera, Relators
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2024
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED, MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY DENIED
On October 7, 2024, relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an emergency
motion for a stay. The court has considered the petition and the motion and determined that
relators have not demonstrated they are entitled to the relief requested. Therefore, the mandamus
petition and the emergency motion are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024CI07778, styled EPIOM LLC v. Tiffany Ryder and Cynthia Vecera, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Tiffany Ryder and Cynthia Vecera v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tiffany-ryder-and-cynthia-vecera-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.