In re Tiffany H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tiffany H.

15 A.D.3d 195, 788 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 943

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 195 (In re Tiffany H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tiffany H., 15 A.D.3d 195, 788 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, [196]*196would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to any alleged inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony, were properly considered by the court and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Ellerin, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, [196]*196would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to any alleged inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony, were properly considered by the court and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Ellerin, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 195, 788 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tiffany-h-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack