in Re Tiffany Davis and Nayajah Davis

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 9, 2014
• Docket: 14-14-00804-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Motion for Emergency Relief Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00802-CR NO. 14-14-00803-CR NO. 14-14-00804-CR

IN RE TIFFANY DAVIS AND NAYAJAH DAVIS, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 262nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1412474, 1412475, 1412476

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 7, 2014, relators Tiffany Davis and Nayajah Davis filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Denise Bradley, presiding judge of the 262nd District Court of Harris County, to vacate a purported order granting a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum filed by real party in interest Harris County Precinct One Constable’s Office. Also on October 7, 2014, relators filed a motion for emergency relief, asking this court to stay the trial scheduled in the underlying proceedings pending this court’s consideration of relators’ petition.

Relators have not satisfied their burden to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny as moot relators’ motion for emergency relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).