In re Tiffany A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tiffany A.

279 A.D.2d 522, 723 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 343

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated January 11, 2000, as denied her cross motion to vacate the intervenor status granted to the former foster parents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis to disturb the order insofar as appealed from.

The Family Court, Queens County, is directed to complete this proceeding forthwith. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated January 11, 2000, as denied her cross motion to vacate the intervenor status granted to the former foster parents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find no basis to disturb the order insofar as appealed from.

The Family Court, Queens County, is directed to complete this proceeding forthwith. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

In re Tiffany A., 279 A.D.2d 522, 723 N.Y.S.2d 859, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

279 A.D.2d 522 (In re Tiffany A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related