In re Tietje

253 F. 283
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 253 F. 283 (In re Tietje) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tietje, 253 F. 283 (E.D.N.Y. 1918).

Opinion

GARVIN, District Judge.

This is a motion to compel the receiver in bankruptcy of Elizabeth V. Tietje, bankrupt, to surrender to said [284]*284Elizabeth V. Tietje, as administratrix of Frederick H. Tietje, deceased, the following property:

(1) Rents received from real estate, including all rents collected by said receiver, and rents collected hy said administratrix ánd paid to said receiver.

(2) Proceeds of sale of horses, wagons, automobiles, and other fixed assets of said estate, sold by J. W. & W. H. Reid, auctioneers.

(3) Proceeds^ of merchandise sold by J. W. & W. H. Reid, auctioneers.

(4) Proceeds of accounts which accrued prior to the receiverships and which have been collected by said receiver, or paid by said administratrix to said receiver.

(5) Proceeds of accounts which accrued while business was conducted-by said receiver. _ ,

_ [1] The receiver was appointed on or about June 13, 1918. Elizabeth V. Tietje was appointed administratrix July 3, 1917. The decedent was engaged in business as a provision dealer. The administratrix continued the business without authority from the Surrogate’s Court. The stock on hand at the time of the decedent’s death was disposed of by the administratrix before the appointment of the receiver.

I am of the opinion that where an administratrix, instead of proceeding forthwith to liquidate the business of the decedent, continues it, incurs new debts, and creates new accounts due without the authority of the Surrogate’s Court, if she is thereafter adjudicated a bankrupt, such merchandise as remains on hand, acquired after she was appointed administratrix, and all outstanding accounts arising after such appointment, are the property of the receiver in bankruptcy. This disposes of the property described in paragraphs (3) and (4).

I have no doubt but that the proceeds’ of all accounts which accrued while the business was being carried on by the receiver belong to him. This refers to tire property described in paragraph (5).

[2] In my judgment, where a. decedent leaves real estate which is transferred to the bankrupt by the next of kin, as was the case here, and the bankrupt has title to the real estate when the petition is filed, no proceedings to sell the same to pay decedent’s debts having been instituted, the creditors of the decedent , have no such interest in the real estate as will justify this court in preventing the receiver in bankruptcy from collecting the debts. The property in paragraph (1) above is affected by this conclusion.

Any personal property belonging to the decedent must be accounted for, if sold by the receiver in bankruptcy, and the proceeds turned over to the administratrix. Property described in paragraph (2) above comes within this class.

This motion must therefore be denied, except that the receiver will be required to pay over to the administratrix the proceeds of sale of horses, wagons, automobiles, and other fixed assets of the estate of Frederick H. Tietje, deceased, sold by J. W. & W. H. Reid, auctioneers.

It follows that this determination requires that the fund created by [285]*285a payment hy Feltman Bros, under order of this court dated July 24, 1918, be turned over to the receiver, or to the trustee, if elected, forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 F. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tietje-nyed-1918.