In re Tidewater Coal Exchange
This text of 296 F. 701 (In re Tidewater Coal Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The claim presented is in two parts'. One is called throughout this litigation the coal credit claim, and the other the demurrage claim.
As to the coal credit claim, this court is of opinion that the Director General recovered below quite as much as he was entitled to. As the trustee did not appeal, we express no opinion as to whether any error was committed in arriving at the result appealed from.
The order in respect of the demurrage claim is affirmed on the opinion of Learned Hand, District Judge, in 292 Fed. 225.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 F. 701, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tidewater-coal-exchange-ca2-1924.