In re Tidewater Coal Exchange
296 F. 701, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3408
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 11, 1924·No. No. 252·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The claim presented is in two parts'. One is called throughout this litigation the coal credit claim, and the other the demurrage claim.
As to the coal credit claim, this court is of opinion that the Director General recovered below quite as much as he was entitled to. As the trustee did not appeal, we express no opinion as to whether any error was committed in arriving at the result appealed from.
The order in respect of the demurrage claim is affirmed on the opinion of Learned Hand, District Judge, in 292 Fed. 225.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Tidewater Coal Exchange, 296 F. 701, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3408 (2d Cir. 1924).
296 F. 701 (In re Tidewater Coal Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Middle Atlantic Conference v. United States
353 F. Supp. 1109 (District of Columbia, 1972)
Nicholson Transit Co. v. Nicholson Universal S. S. Co.
60 F.2d 90 (Sixth Circuit, 1932)