In re Tice

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Tice

139 A.3d 1186, 225 N.J. 605, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 704

DecidedJuly 22, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.3d 1186 (In re Tice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tice, 139 A.3d 1186, 225 N.J. 605, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 704 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-220, concluding that the violations of RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 by RICHARD L. TICE of FLEMING-TON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, are de minimis and undeserving of formal discipline, and that the formal complaint in District Docket No. XIV-2011-0518E therefore should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against RICHARD L. TICE in District Docket NO. XIV-2011-0518E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-220, concluding that the violations of RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 by RICHARD L. TICE of FLEMING-TON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, are de minimis and undeserving of formal discipline, and that the formal complaint in District Docket No. XIV-2011-0518E therefore should be dismissed, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint against RICHARD L. TICE in District Docket NO. XIV-2011-0518E is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.3d 1186, 225 N.J. 605, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tice-nj-2016.